REALLY SOUND SAMPLER by Daniel Azzopardi Yes, its another sound sampler. Yes, it'll actually work this time. But no, it's not just the same as all the others. It is, in fact, much better. The main difference is that Daniel Azzopardi (Does he? Where? Ed) has incorporated lots of 128K features into it. He says that not only can you record samples up to 96K long (which is roughly three and a half weeks of recording time, according to my calculations), but the program also takes advantage of the dear old AY sound chip. I'm not quite sure what he means by this second bit, but I've a sneaky suspicion it might be something to do with the different volumes you can play things back at. It also boasts variable frequencies and a sort of graph thing, like at the beginning of Angels. (You know! That crap BBC drama about nurses where everybody died!) But all of this doesn't make it a 128K-only program. It'll work fine on 48K Speccies too, but without quite so many features. Before you start worrying about how it all works and everything, the first thing to do is get it up and running. To do that, type in the BASIC section of the program and save it with SAVE "sampler" LINE 720. Then you'll have to load up the Hex Loader and type in the Hex listing. (Oh no! Several thousand rapidly dispersing Pitstop readers!) Save the code produced after the BASIC part and there you are. Upon running the sampler, lots of writing will appear, along with a little line that moves slowly along the bottom of the screen. That's your graph thingy, which will jiggle up and down if you play something through the ear socket. (The ear socket being where you play in what you want to sample, of course.) I won't bother listing all the keys the program uses, as it displays them all on the screen for you. The extra 128K functions might need some explaining though. Keys 1 and 2 swap between the various 16K pages of memory, so you can store a sample in each. G, on the other hand, "glues" all the pages together into one long sample. E does an echo (echo, e c h o) effect, which apparently works best with small samples. Don't expect to be bowled over by the sound quality or anything, but I defy anyone to come up with a better Speccy sampler. (Although if you do, you'll have to wait a few months to see it in print, as I've had it up to here with samplers for the time being.)